También disponible en Español → Qué buscan Marriott, Hilton, IHG, Hyatt y Wyndham
Related reading: Brand development programs · How to select a hotel brand
Major brand development teams evaluate owners and projects against clear fit criteria: location, product, capital, operator path, and execution readiness. Knowing what they look for changes how you prepare before the first call.
Step one: read the brand's market footprint
Map what each brand already has in your submarket before you call.
Density vs white space changes leverage. A conversion of a competitor or a missing tier can still matter in a dense market. In white space, you may have more power than you think.
What every brand evaluates
These are table stakes across Marriott, Hilton, IHG, Hyatt, and Wyndham.
- Market viability: feasibility, competitive set, demand mix, realistic projections
- Financial credibility: equity, construction financing, ability to fund standards through ramp
- Operational history: quality scores and compliance if you have operated before; team and operator strength if first project
- Conversion vs new build: conversions often move faster in brand pipelines; new builds face longer standards and timeline review
Marriott International
Marriott emphasizes long-term partnership and clear brand-tier fit across a full portfolio and Bonvoy scale.
Arrive knowing which flag and why. Soft-brand paths (Autograph, Tribute) need genuine independent identity, not a failed hard-brand fallback. Existing Marriott operators should lead with compliance and performance history.
Hilton
Hilton pairs active pipeline growth with owner economics and system depth across many chain scales.
Teams specialize by tier. Consistency, PIP discipline, and guest scores matter. Multi-property intent often changes the conversation versus a one-off project.
IHG Hotels & Resorts
IHG frames development around disciplined growth and owner-centric economics with strong franchise density in many markets.
Show how operations deliver the brand promise, not only pro forma returns. CALA regional teams matter for local financing and demand patterns.
Hyatt
Hyatt is more selective by volume and protects upper-upscale and lifestyle positioning carefully.
Lead with guest experience and design fit, then economics. Expect a more bilateral, high-conviction process. Select-service (Hyatt Place, Hyatt House) is more conventional but still design-sensitive.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
Wyndham is franchise-first at scale, with an owner-economics orientation across economy through midscale and conversion paths.
Emphasize operational readiness, realistic tier economics, and conversion efficiency where relevant.
How owners should prepare
Define project profile, capital structure, operator path, competitive set, and decision criteria before the first development call.
Brands know the deals they pitched. They do not know the deals they never heard about. A private, owner-controlled process lets qualified brands compete on organized facts.
A clearer way to run this process
Dealality is hotel deal-making done as a clear confidential process. We help owners see real options, talk to the right brands and operators, compare offers side by side, and choose the best path for the hotel before they commit.
Same hotel. Different process. Different outcome.
Start at dealality.com.
Joan Dejarden is the founder of Dealality, a confidential platform for hotel brand and operator selection. He has seen both sides of hotel deals across the CALA, Americas, and Europe.
Disclaimer: Marriott, Hilton, IHG, Hyatt, and Wyndham are independent companies and registered trademarks of their respective owners. This article references publicly available development positioning for informational purposes only.